Anchor Dares to Ask Planned Parenthood Boss When Life Begins; She Dodges: It 'Isn't Really Relevant'
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2014/02/28/anchor-dares-ask-planned-parenthood-boss-when-life-begins-she-avoids-ans#ixzz2v0VtWmxV
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion conglomerate, did an interview Thursday on the new Fusion network with anchorman Jorge Ramos.
The section sparking everyone’s attention came when Ramos – self-respecting enough to offer more than the piffle a Ronan Farrow offers on MSNBC – asked when life begins for Richards. She labored mightily not to answer, since abortion advocates eschew science and believe that women should be able to abort even AFTER a child is born:
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2014/02/28/anchor-dares-ask-planned-parenthood-boss-when-life-begins-she-avoids-ans#ixzz2v0VhhSkz
JORGE RAMOS: Can I ask you a philosophical question?
Mr. Ramos is way off base when asks the questions because this isn't a philosophical question to begin with...it is a Biblical question and and maybe even a scientific question but it definitely not a philosophical question.
CECILE RICHARDS: Sure.
RAMOS So for you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?
Seriously "When does a human being become a human being?"...When does a tree become a tree? When does a whale become a whale? How did this guy get a job on TV?
RICHARDS This is a question, I think, that will be debated through the centuries, and people come down to very different views on that.
RAMOS But for you, what’s the point?
RICHARDS It is not something that I feel like is really part of this conversation. I mean, to me, we work with women – I guess the way I’d really like to I think every woman has to make her own decision. What we do at Planned Parenthood is make sure that women have all their options for health care, and they have the option to have a healthy pregnancy, they have the option to put a child up for adoption if they decide to carry the pregnancy to term, or they have the right to make a decision to terminate a pregnancy.
Ramos tried to pierce through the moral relativism one more time, and Richards repeated "I don’t think it’s really relevant to the conversation," but then she said for her three children, their “life began when I delivered them.”
On Friday, Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser offered a pro-life response:
Cecile Richards’ comments were insensitive and unfeeling to any woman who has ever been pregnant, especially those women who have suffered the pain of miscarriage.
This is an example of the problem of getting so wrapped up in the politics of ‘reproductive choice,’ that the real experience of pregnant women becomes secondary. Richards’ statement misses what most Americans understand about pregnancy, especially women. There are two human beings involved.
If there are disappointments at the ballot box for Planned Parenthood in 2014 it will be an outgrowth of this disconnect with the women they claim to represent.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2014/02/28/anchor-dares-ask-planned-parenthood-boss-when-life-begins-she-avoids-ans#ixzz2v0Vbyh5I
How is the beginning of life not relevant to when a life should be "terminated"? According to this lady's "philosophy" then life begins at birth. What happens when she decides life begins at 2 yrs old? Can she then make a "choice" to terminate the life of the human who has yet to become a human being according to her "philosophy"? If it is all based on personal philosophy that is program into our DNA then who are we to tell someone their philosophy is wrong? When will it end? How far will this be taken?
Comments in red by Jamie
No comments:
Post a Comment